leica m240 vs m262 image quality leica m240 vs m262 image quality

My primary reasons for upgrading were: better high ISO capabilities ie. Have a read of this for tips. Paste as plain text instead, Forget is a strong word. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. The big round dial on the back of the M9 was always tricky to use. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. Turns out that was bollocks too! Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. By Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. Like most people, I suspect. By Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. Find out more about 35mmc here. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. That said, M10 GAS is real. May be different sensor calibration? There is a slight sense that this camera isnt a major model it feels a tiny bit like theres a few too many buttons, and that the body of the camera is a little hollow, but in practice these things go unnoticed. (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). I find it very quick. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. The following dropbox link to a small group of images hopefully illustrate these subtle but apparent colour densities. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! More humble pie for me! The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Why torture yourself? An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. No more out of focus shots. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. Its. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. If you want video and live view, get the 240. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. As I understand technically m240 is similar to m262 (only some features, but not sensor). Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. Quality over quantity. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. I will stick with my film Leica for now. This isnt me highlighting something bad though, it makes no difference to anything really. I use it for mostly personal/travel type shooting, with the occasional casual paid shoot. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. Another M10 fetish. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . We were perfectly happy in the film days when KODAK or FUJI(film) updated our sensor with a new emulsion. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . The image on the back screen of the Leica M240 is very cool toned and unsaturated. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. The settings I use (format and manual or auto lens designation) pop up first on the main menu and with 2 clicks both actions are completed. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M8 A Year with an Ageing Digital Rangefinder By Rui Hu, Panasonic GM1 Review: A Digital ILC Alternative to the Olympus XA2? The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. Leica M262 M-P M10 M262 Leica M-E . Which is the better buy? I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. Your previous content has been restored. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. Yura, I still use both with other M along. First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. Dont get me wrong Hamish, if I didnt have to give the Taxman an additional sum equal to a Leica M10 last Spring, Id have been tempted! One is not better or worse than the other, they are just different. I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. Let's try another side by side Leica Monochrom - 50 Lux - click for larger and crop - Leica M 240 - click for larger. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has []. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. Everything is very tactile. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . Ah yes, sorry, of course the screen is actually useful! The price is$5195/4050. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. This never really bothered me about the M9, but having the issue taken away made me appreciate the issue for what it was. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. On 12/27/2020 at 11:24 AM, a.noctilux said: On 12/27/2020 at 12:24 PM, a.noctilux said: Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount , https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. Yet all the buttons on it and the LCD still have me pining for Leicas. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. The M240 is wide and bulky. I used the M240 for over two years before upgrading to the M10 a year and a half ago. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. I remember when live-view first started appearing on interchangeable lens digital cameras. The Leica M9/ M8 B&W JPEGs can be created 95-99% in camera and I would say my black and white film images are 88% in camera/film developing, 2% scanning, 10% in computer to remove dust and do any basic darkroom style adjustments. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). But in the context of the fact that functional simplicity is a big part of what attracts people to Leica cameras, its hard not to be impressed by the Leica M262. If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. Upload or insert images from URL. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. If live view/video is a don't care then buy the lower cost camera. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. With sensor shift, the image sensor (rather than the lens) moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. - Leica M 262 & Voigtlnder 50/1.2. Thanks. You cannot paste images directly. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. Unknown. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. If you like aluminium choose the M262, if you prefer brass go for the M240. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. There is still some faint banding, but a huge improvement over the M240. Image quality will be essentially the same. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. Of course they can, but you have them. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. There are two things to be separated here. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. I missed his musings in AP. That said, I dont shoot Leicas for rapidity.Start Up. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. I turned off automatic review and theres no chimping, and with an ISO dial I dont even need to use any buttons throughout a shoot.